Translating Values: Number-to-ASCII Conversion (EE Tip #147)

There is a neat trick for performing the number-to-ASCII conversion. (We are not sure of this trick’s origin. We’d love to hear from anyone who saw it long ago and can us more about it.)ASCII-iStock_000007340231_Large

One starts by defining an array in the 8051 family microcontroller’s code segment using the following command:

HEX_NUM: DB ‘0123456789ABCDEF’

Following the conventions that now seem to be pretty standard for 8051 family assemblers, this command cause an array whose values are the ASCII values of the characters within the single quotes to be stored in the code segment (assuming that that is the segment in which you are working). To convert a number between 0 and 15 to the relevant ASCII value, you now need only store the value to be converted in the accumulator, A, and the location of the array HEX_NUM in the data pointer, DPTR. You then give the single command MOVC A, @A+DPTR. This command uses the current value of the accumulator, the value you are looking to translate into an ASCII value, as an offset and reads the relevant value of the array into A (thus overwriting the value you wanted to “translate” with the correct translation). Thus, if A starts off with a 5, it ends up with the sixth element of the array (as there is an element with a zero offset)—which is just the ASCII value of 5, and all of this takes place without any hard work on the part of the programmer.—Ahron Emanuel, Shlomo Engelberg, and Dvir Ophir (“Virtual Instrumentation, Circuit Cellar 294, 2015)

A Coding Interface for an Evaluation Tool

John Peck, a test engineer at Knowles Electronics in Itasca, IL, has used ASCII interfaces to test equipment since he was a graduate student.

“I love test equipment with open, well-documented, ASCII command sets,” he says. “The plain text commands give a complicated instrument a familiar interface and an easy way to automate measurements.”

So when Peck needed to automate the process of reading his ultrasonic range finder’s voltage output, he wanted an ASCII interface to a voltmeter. He also wanted the meter to convert volts into distance, so he added an Atmel AVR Butterfly microcontroller into the mix (see Photo 1). “I thought it would be easy to give it a plain text interface to a PC,” he says.

Atmel AVR Butterfly

Atmel AVR Butterfly

The project became a bit more complex than he expected. But ultimately, Peck says, he came up came up with “a simple command interface that’s easy to customize and extend. It’s not at the level of a commercial instrument, but it works well for sending a few commands and getting some data back.”

If you would like to learn more about how to send commands from a PC to the AVR Butterfly and the basics of using the credit card-sized, single-board microcontroller to recognize, parse, and execute remote commands, read Peck’s article about his project in Circuit Cellar’s May issue.

In the italicized excerpts below, he describes his hardware connections to the board and the process of receiving remote characters (the first step in receiving remote commands). Other topics you’ll find in the full article include setting up a logging system to understand how commands are being processed, configuring the logger (which is the gatekeeper for messages from other subsystems), recognizing and adding commands to extend the system, and sending calibration values.

Peck programmed his system so that it has room to grow and can accommodate his future plans:

“I built the code with AVR-GCC, using the -Os optimization level. The output of avr-gcc –version is avr-gcc (Gentoo 4.6.3 p1.3, pie-0.5.1) 4.6.3.

“The resulting memory map file shows a 306-byte .data size, a 49-byte .bss size, and a 7.8-KB .text size. I used roughly half of the AVR Butterfly’s flash memory and about a third of its RAM. So there’s at least some space left to do more than just recognizing commands and calibrating voltages.”

“I’d like to work on extending the system to handle more types of arguments (e.g., signed integers and floats). And I’d like to port the system to a different part, one with more than one USART. Then I could have a dedicated logging port and log messages wouldn’t get in the way of other communication. Making well-documented interfaces to my designs would help me with my long-term goal of making them more modular.”

These are the connections needed for Atmel’s AVR Butterfly. Atmel’s AVRISP mkII user’s guide stresses that the programmer must be connected to the PC before the target (AVR Butterfly board).

Figure 1: These are the connections needed for Atmel’s AVR Butterfly. Atmel’s AVRISP mkII user’s guide stresses that the programmer must be connected to the PC before the target (AVR Butterfly board).

The AVR Butterfly board includes an Atmel ATmega169 microcontroller and some peripherals. Figure 1 shows the connections I made to it. I only used three wires from the DB9 connector for serial communication with the PC. There isn’t any hardware handshaking. While I could also use this serial channel for programming, I find that using a dedicated programmer makes iterating my code much faster.

A six-pin header soldered to the J403 position enabled me to use Atmel’s AVRISP mkII programmer. Finally, powering the board with an external supply at J401 meant I wouldn’t have to think about the AVR Butterfly’s button cell battery. However, I did need to worry about the minimum power-on reset slope rate. The microcontroller won’t reset at power-on unless the power supply can ramp from about 1 to 3 V at more than 0.1 V/ms. I had to reduce a filter capacitor in my power supply circuit to increase its power-on ramp rate. With that settled, the microcontroller started executing code when I turned on the power supply.

After the hardware was connected, I used the AVR downloader uploader (AVRDUDE) and GNU Make to automate building the code and programming the AVR Butterfly’s flash memory. I modified a makefile template from the WinAVR project to specify my part, programmer, and source files. The template file’s comments helped me understand how to customize the template and comprehend the general build process. Finally, I used Gentoo, Linux’s cross-development package, to install the AVR GNU Compiler Collection (AVR-GCC) and other cross-compilation tools. I could have added these last pieces “by hand,” but Gentoo conveniently updates the toolchain as new versions are released.


Figure 2: This is the program flow for processing characters received over the Atmel AVR Butterfly’s USART. Sending a command terminator (carriage return) will always result in an empty Receive buffer. This is a good way to ensure there’s no garbage in the buffer before writing to it.

To receive remote commands, you begin by receiving characters, which are sent to the AVR Butterfly via the USART connector shown in Figure 1. Reception of these characters triggers an interrupt service routine (ISR), which handles them according to the flow shown in Figure 2. The first step in this flow is loading the characters into the Receive buffer.

Figure 3: The received character buffer and pointers used to fill it are shown. There is no limit to the size of commands and their arguments, as long as the entire combined string and terminator fit inside the RECEIVE_BUFFER_SIZE.

Figure 3: The received character buffer and pointers used to fill it are shown. There is no limit to the size of commands and their arguments, as long as the entire combined string and terminator fit inside the RECEIVE_BUFFER_SIZE.

Figure 3 illustrates the Receive buffer loaded with a combined string. The buffer is accessed with a pointer to its beginning and another pointer to the next index to be written. These pointers are members of the recv_cmd_state_t-type variable recv_cmd_state.

This is just style. I like to try to organize a flow’s variables by making them members of their own structure. Naming conventions aside, it’s important to notice that no limitations are imposed on the command or argument size in this first step, provided the total character count stays below the RECEIVE_BUFFER_SIZE limit.

When a combined string in the Receive buffer is finished with a carriage return, the string is copied over to a second buffer. I call this the “Parse buffer,” since this is where the string will be searched for recognized commands and arguments. This buffer is locked until its contents can be processed to keep it from being overwhelmed by new combined strings.

Sending commands faster than they can be processed will generate an error and combined strings sent to a locked parse buffer will be dropped. The maximum command processing frequency will depend on the system clock and other system tasks. Not having larger parse or receive buffers is a limitation that places this project at the hobby level. Extending these buffers to hold more than just one command would make the system more robust.

Editor’s Note: If you are interested in other projects utilizing the AVR Butterfly, check out the Talk Zombie, which won “Distinctive Excellence” in the AVR Design Contest 2006 sponsored by ATMEL and administered by Circuit Cellar. The ATmega169-based multilingual talking device relates ambient temperature and current time in the form of speech (English, Dutch, or French). 

A Timely Look at RFID Technology

Most of us have had that annoying experience of setting off an alarm as we leave a store because one item in our bags has a still-active radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag. So it’s back to the cashier for some deactivation (or to security for some questioning).

Retailers love RFID, for obvious reasons. So do other industries and governments dealing with limiting building access; tracking goods, livestock and people; collecting highway tolls and public transit fares; checking passports; finding airport baggage; managing hospital drug inventory… The list goes on and on.

RFIDRFID is a big business, and it is anticipated to grow despite concerns about privacy issues. Market researcher IDTechEx recently estimated that the RFID market—including tags, readers, and software and services for RFID labels, fobs, cards, and other form factors—will hit $9.2 billion in 2014 and increase to $30.24 billion in 2024.

So it’s good timing for columnist Jeff Bachiochi’s series about passive RFID tagging. Part 1 appears in Circuit Cellar’s May issue and focuses on read-only tags and transponder circuitry. It also hints at Bachiochi’s unfolding RFID project.

Other May issue highlights include DIY project articles describing an MCU-based trapdoor lift system, a customizable approach to an ASCII interface for sending commands to a sensor tool and receiving data, and a solar-powered home automation controller that enables household-device management and cloud connectivity to log temperature, energy use, and other data.

In addition, our columnists explore low-power wireless data receivers, testing and analyzing old and new batteries in a personal collection, and designing data centers to participate in smart-grid power management.

If you are a female engineer in search of some inspiration, read our interview with embedded systems expert Elecia White. Also, find out why new technology means a bright future for LEDs in emissive microdisplays.

Turn Your Android Device into an Application Tool

A few years ago, the Android Open Accessory initiative was announced with the aim of making it easier for hardware manufacturers to create accessories that work with every Android device. Future Technology Devices International (FTDI) joined the initiative and last year introduced the FTD311D multi-interface Android host IC. The goal was to enable engineers and designers to make effective use of tablets and smartphones with the Android OS, according to Circuit Cellar columnist Jeff Bachiochi.

The FTD311D “provides an instant bridge from an Android USB port(B) to peripheral hardware over general purpose input-out (GPIO), UART, PWM, I2C Master, SPI Slave, or SPI Master interfaces,” Bachiochi says.

In the magazine’s December issue Bachiochi takes a comprehensive look at the USB Android host IC and how it works. By the end of his article, readers will have learned quite a bit about how to use FTDI’s apps and the FT311D chip to turn an Android device into their own I/0 tool.

Bachiochi used the SPI Master demo to read key presses and set LED states on this SPI slave 16-key touch panel.

Bachiochi used the SPI Master demo to read key presses and set LED states on this SPI slave 16-key touch panel.

Here is how Bachiochi describes the FT311D and its advantages:

The FT311D is a full-speed USB host targeted at providing access to peripheral hardware from a USB port on an Android device. While an Android device can be a USB host, many are mobile devices with limited power. For now, these On-The-Go (OTG) ports will be USB devices only (i.e., they can only connect to a USB host as a USB device).

Since the USB host is responsible for supplying power to a USB peripheral device, it would be bad design practice to enable a USB peripheral to drain an Android mobile device’s energy. Consequently, the FT311D takes on the task of USB host, eliminating any draw on the Android device’s battery.

All Android devices from V3.1 (Honeycomb) support the Android Open Accessory Mode (AOAM). The AOAM is the complete reverse of the conventional USB interconnect. This game-changing approach to attaching peripherals enables three key advantages. First, there is no need to develop special drivers for the hardware; second, it is unnecessary to root devices to alter permissions for loading drivers; and third, the peripheral provides the power to use the port, which ensures the mobile device battery is not quickly drained by the external hardware being attached.

Since the FT311D handles the entire USB host protocol, USB-specific firmware programming isn’t required. As the host, the FT311D must inquire whether the connected device supports the AOAM. If so, it will operate as an Open Accessory Mode device with one USB BULK IN endpoint and one USB BULK OUT endpoint (as well as the control endpoint.) This interface will be a full-speed (12-Mbps) USB enabling data transfer in and out.

The AOAM USB host has a set of string descriptors the Android OS is capable of reading. These strings are (user) associated with an Android OS application. The Android then uses these strings to automatically start the application when the hardware is connected. The FT311D is configured for one of its multiple interfaces via configuration inputs at power-up. Each configuration will supply the Android device with a unique set of string descriptors, therefore enabling different applications to run, depending on its setup.

The FT311D’s configuration determines whether each application will have access to several user interface APIs that are specific to each configuration.

The article goes on to examine the various interfaces in detail and to describe a number of demo projects, including a multimeter.

Many of Bachiochi's projects use printable ASCII text commands and replies. This enables a serial terminal to become a handy user I/O device. This current probe circuit outputs its measurements in ASCII-printable text.

Many of Bachiochi’s projects use printable ASCII text commands and replies. This enables a serial terminal to become a handy user I/O device. This current probe circuit outputs its measurements in ASCII-printable text.

Multimeters are great tools. They have portability that enables them to be brought to wherever a measurement must be made. An Android device has this same ability. Since applications can be written for these devices, they make a great portable application tool. Until the AOAM’s release, there was no way for these devices to be connected to any external circuitry and used as an effective tool.

I think FTDI has bridged this gap nicely. It provided a great interface chip that can be added to any circuit that will enable an Android device to serve as an effective user I/O device. I’ve used the chip to quickly interface with some technology to discover its potential or just test its abilities. But I’m sure you are already thinking about the other potential uses for this connection.

Bachiochi is curious to hear from readers about their own ideas.

If you think the AOAM has future potential, but you want to know what’s involved with writing Android applications for a specific purpose, send me an e-mail and I’ll add this to my list of future projects!

You can e-mail Bachiochi at or post your comment here.